Autumn 2003

 

Published by: SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201

 

Inside This Issue

General News

Managing Variation on the Pig Farm

Research Advances

Blood Spots in Eggs

Compensatory Growth in Broilers

Avian Advice: University of Arkansas

Eating Behaviour Of Pigs And Feeder

 

 

General News

 

Following a period of rocketing ingredient prices we are now faced with prices that are returning to where they should be. Unfortunately product prices have also fallen but this may have a positive spin-off in the long term through increased demand, providing of course that retailers drop their prices as well.

 

Courses

Our next poultry course is scheduled for 30 June – 2 July 2003. Please contact Bianca on (011) 803-2050 if you are interested in attending.

 

Books

We still have a number of copies of Leeson and Summers' book entitled Broiler Breeder Production, the price of which is R 500.00 excluding VAT.

 

Format International’s Education Program

Format International have become aware that whilst most companies in the feed industry use Format software to produce their formulations and manage their raw material strategies, very few young graduates are entering the industry with any knowledge of the system. In an attempt to redress this situation they have implemented an "education" program which will work as follows:

 

  1. A 10 user license of Single-Mix on the Institution network
  2. R 1000.00/year charge
  3. Full access to the website and support
  4. Professor gets a printed copy of the manual
  5. Student will get a manual on a CD together with the b) Single-Mix skills training CD.  They will also get a copy of Single-Mix jr on CD (it's a five nutrient five ingredient version of Single-Mix) so that they can practise at home.

  6.  

We have already implemented the system at TUKS and this year all undergraduate students will have to be able to formulate using Single-Mix if they are to pass my monogastric nutrition course. We have used the SPESFEED program in the past so this is real progress.

 

Rick Kleyn

Top

 

Managing Variation on the Pig Farm

 

This is the first of two articles that will be carried by the SPESFEED News by consulting veterinarian, Dr Pieter Grimbeek.

 

Pork production today is more than ever about the cost of production and survival. The South African pig industry is going through a period of rapid changes as it attempts to position itself against imports from an active global market and to establish itself in an extremely competitive, internal market which is unsympathetic to pork. A consistent supply of pork in the quantity and quality desired by processors and consumers is crucial to long term stability and to be viability of the industry.

 

Minimising and managing the variation that occurs at all stages of the production chain is perhaps one of the biggest challenges currently facing the pig industry as it restructures and adapts to new housing systems and technologies.

 

Modern ideas like batch furrowing, SEW, multi-site production, AIAO management, split sex feeding, phase feeding, wet-dry feeding, alternative housing systems, environmentally controlled farrowing and weaning houses, wet walls, fans and many others are all gaining acceptance in an industry that is slowly awakening from a slumber.

 

On many of the farms I visit these adaptations of technologies and systems have improved whole of life growth rate from 560 grams per day to 650 grams per day, but it is the next step to 700 grams and more, that is eluding many producers. Some of the financial benefits derived from improved performance is often offset by decreased revenue because of variation, that is often most apparent at the end of the grower period. We know, however, that some sources of variation originate much earlier in the production chain.

 

Frey (1988) listed the following factors that are reported to increase variation in grower / finisher pigs:

 

genotype and breeding system
management system
access feed and water
group size
feed delivery
sorting and co-mingling
space allocation
stockmanship
dominant / submissive behaviour
temperature control
season
disease.

 

The effect of disease on variation is often not well documented and not as frequently reported as effects of other parameters such as sex or environment. Patrick et. al. (1993) in a controlled study, found that pigs exhibiting clinical disease and then treated, took an additional 15.3 days to reach slaughter weight.

 

Skirrow (1993) reported the mean and standard deviation for groups of pneumonia-free and pneumonia-affected pigs.

 

 

Pneumonia free

Pneumonia positive

Study 1

   

CV of growth rate

5.9 %

7.5 %

Days to market

175

187

Study 2

   

CV of growth rate

5.0 %

9.0 %

Days to market

178

193

 

The variation in pneumonia positive groups was 27 % higher in trial 1 and 80 % higher in trial 2 than pneumonia-free herds.

 

Top

 

Economic impact of variation

Most producers are well aware that variation in pig production and performance has a major impact on the profitability of their enterprises. The cost of performance variation is difficult to quantify, as are the costs and benefits of control measures. New software technologies are becoming available to transform data collected on farm and at the abattoir into useful managerial information by using statistical techniques to distinguish between normal and abnormal trait variation. Deen and Davies (1998) developed a similar methodology to evaluate cost of sow output and Dritz and Tokach (1998) for optimising profit and pig flow in AIAO grower facilities.

 

Variation in production and performance is a very real, but often hidden, cost to the producer that is difficult to quantify. Disease is a major source of variation. Strategies to reduce the impact of disease include:

 

improving stockmanship
optimising weaning age
assessing onset of disease
standardising intervention protocols
promoting health through optimal environment and nutrition
designing pig flow
reduce pathogen load
improving or maintaining herd health standards and these include technologies like closed herd techniques, single sourcing practices, AI programs and depop – repop practices.
 

In the next article in this series, the sourcing of genetic material will be discussed together with a more in depth discussion on depop – repop practices.

Dr. P.J. Grimbeek

Potchefstroom

 

Research Advances

 

Interactions between dietary crude protein and essential amino acid intake on performance in broilers:

 

Sklan and Plavnik (Br Poult Science, Volume 43) evaluated the effect of diets with increasing concentrations of crude protein, at either fixed essential amino acid concentrations or at fixed essential amino acid: dietary crude protein ratios, on performance was examined in 1- to 4-week-old male Cobb chicks. Increasing crude protein intakes at constant essential amino acid concentrations was carried out at two dietary energy contents.

 

Increasing protein resulted in a linear decrease in feed intake while weight gain and feed efficiency changed quadratically with a smaller positive effect at the highest crude protein intakes. Feed intake decreased and feed efficiency increased with higher dietary energy and interactions between protein and energy were significant. Abdominal fat content and the efficiency of protein retention decreased with increasing dietary protein intake.

 

Using constant essential amino acid: crude protein ratios at increasing crude protein intakes, resulted in feed intake, weight gain and feed efficiency all increasing before reaching a plateau. Abdominal fat decreased with protein intake and the efficiency of protein retention was quadratic, decreasing at the higher protein intakes.

 

Multiple regression analysis of the results of these trials indicated that partition of energy intake into maintenance, fat-free tissue growth, fat and the energy required to transform protein intake in excess of retention explained more than 98% of variation. It is proposed that either non-essential amino acid or essential amino acid intake limited broiler performance at the lower protein intakes, whereas at high protein intakes the decreased efficiency of amino acid utilisation after growth requirements are fulfilled, resulted in poorer performance.

 

It was concluded that these results support the general principle that diets should be formulated to provide sufficient of all AA for protein synthesis and that excess AA should be avoided, as this decreases the efficiency of utilisation and also increases the essential AA requirements.

 

Phytase Supplementation for Rearing and Production of Heavy Strain Broiler Breeders.

 

Li, Berry and Oates of Auburn Universities Department of Poultry Science published work on the use of phytase in broiler breeders. Little information is available about whether phytase can be used to replace phosphorus in rearing and production diets of breeder replacement pullets and hens. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of dietary phytase on growth and liveability of pullets during the rearing phase and their subsequent production performance during the entire breeder period.

 

Onethousand day-old female breeder chicks were placed in 4 pens with 250 birds each receiving 2 dietary treatments with 2 pens each treatment in a litter floored light proof pullet house. Male chicks were reared separately. Control pullets received a diet with 0.35%AP added inorganic phosphorus. Phytase treated pullets received a diet with 0.25%AP, supplemented with 300 U/kg phytase. At 22 weeks of age, 800 pullets were allocated to 8 pens in a curtain sided, slat litter breeder house. There were 100 hens per pen. Four pens each received either a control diet containing 0.3%AP without phytase or a phytase diet containing 0.1%AP supplemented with 300U/kg phytase. In the first 22 weeks, there was no significant difference in mortality, body weight or weight uniformity between control and phytase treatment groups. Every 4 weeks, 40 birds from each treatment were measured for shank and keel length and 4 birds from each treatment were killed for measurement of digestive tract length including large intestine & ceca, small intestine, pancreas and gizzard. Blood samples were taken from 40 hens in each treatment to determination of plasma total protein, calcium and phosphorous. Litter samples were taken for determination of litter phosphorus.

 

The nutritional value of de-germed, de-hulled corn for pigs and its impact on the gastrointestinal tract and nutrient excretion

 

Moeser et al. (J Animal Science 43, 10) from North Carolina State University designed three experiments to assess the feeding value and potential environmental benefits of feeding de-germed, de-hulled corn, a low fibre by-product originating from the corn dry milling process, to pigs. To South Africans this product is know as mealie meal.

 

Twelve 27-kg (SE = 0.8) barrows were used in Exp. 1 to measure the apparent faecal digestibility of DM, GE and N of de-germed, de-hulled corn compared with corn grain. Two diets were formulated to contain either 96.4% of de-germed, de-hulled corn or corn grain plus supplemental vitamins and minerals. Digestibility of DM, GE, and N was greater in de-germed, de-hulled corn (96.2, 96.0, and 93.6%, respectively) compared with corn grain (89.0, 89.0, and 78.4%, respectively) (P < 0.01). Overall, a 67 and 29% reduction in DM and N excretion, respectively, was observed.

 

In Exp. 2, eight 70-kg (SE =1.8) barrows were surgically fitted with ileal cannulae and fed the same diets as in Exp. 1, to measure the ileal digestibility of nutrients in de-germed, de-hulled corn. Ileal digestibility of DM, energy, and N was 13, 15, and 7% greater in de-germed, de-hulled corn (P < 0.05). Apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of leucine, methionine, and phenylalanine were greater in de-germed, de-hulled corn compared with corn grain (P < 0.05) while a trend for a lower tryptophan digestibility in de-germed, de-hulled corn was observed (P = 0.067).

 

In Experiment 3, 96 nursery pigs with an initial average BW of 8.8 kg (SE = 0.08), fed a starter diet formulated with de-germed de-hulled corn or corn grain as the major grain source, were used in a 28-d growth performance study. At the end of the study, 24 pigs (1 pig per pen) were sacrificed and gastrointestinal tract measurements were taken. Daily growth rates of pigs were the same between diets (0.64 kg/d). A trend for reduced feed intake (P = 0.073) in pigs fed de-germed, de-hulled corn led to a 4% improvement in gain to feed (P < 0.05). Feeding de-germed, de-hulled corn had no effect on gut fill, gastrointestinal tract weight, or liver weight (P > 0.05). Ileal villus lengths and crypt depths were not affected by feeding de-germed, de-hulled corn although ileal villus widths were greater in pigs fed corn grain. Results from these trials suggest that corn processed to remove poorly digestible fibre fractions provides more digestible nutrients than corn grain. As a result, de-germed, de-hulled corn reduces faecal and N excretion, thus providing a means to reduce nutrient excretion.

 

Results from this study suggest that processing corn to remove poorly digestible fibre fractions significantly improves the digestibility and retention of energy and nitrogen. In addition, reductions in dietary fibre content via addition of de-germed, de-hulled corn to pig nursery diets improve feed efficiency by 4%. The use of de-germed, de-hulled corn in pig diets has potential to greatly reduce faecal and nitrogen excretion, thus providing a potential means to reduce the negative environmental impacts of intensive pig production. Future research should focus on the effects of de-germed, de-hulled corn on nutrient excretion when incorporated into a complete feed and the long-term health effects of feeding this product to pigs, specifically the potential occurrenc of gastric ulcers.

Rick Kleyn

 

Top

 

Blood Spots in Eggs

 

The occurrence of blood spots in eggs is a problem that rears its head every so often. It remains a problem on a particular farm for a while then disappears as quietly as it arrived.

 

Some of the possible causes of an increase in bloodspots are listed below.

 

Avoid situations that can frighten chickens, especially when walking into a laying house. Although the theory of frightened chickens is debatable, excessive activity can be a contributing factor to blood spots.
Rodenticides may be involved in blood spots. Layers raised on litter occasionally have access to mice that have died of rodenticides that may result in blood spots.
Sulfa antibiotics, if administered in high levels, have been implicated in causing blood spots.
Check your feed for the presence of 3-Nitro, Histostat or arsenilic acid. Consult with a poultry nutritionist to determine whether these may be a contributing factor.
Mycotoxins have recently been implicated in cases where there has been an increase in blood spots.

 

Generally eggs with blood spots are safe to eat.

 

Grasso Ebako

University of Nebraska

Top

 

Compensatory Growth in Broilers

 

Under commercial conditions birds might be restricted unintentionally due to a number of factors e.g. Limited access to feed or water.

 

Compensatory growth, following a period of restriction has been well-documented in broilers over many years. It has been shown that broilers can recover after a period of restriction under experimental conditions. However it depends on the nature and severity of the restriction placed on the birds. If for example birds are fed a high spec diet and restricted quantitatively they can recover quite well.

 

Under commercial conditions, however, farmers don’t often see the effects of compensatory growth. This is largely due to competition for feeder and drinker space. Birds compete for feed and in doing so scratch and bruise each other which means there are downgrades on carcasses and lower returns for the farmer.

 

SO WHAT CAN FARMERS DO TO GAIN THE FULL BENEFIT OF COMPENSATORY GROWTH?

 

Stocking density, of course, plays a big role and in an open sided house-birds are stocked up to 15/m2 and in a closed house 22/m2. It is a good idea to increase the number of feeders by approximately 9 more per 1000 birds. Or the converse might work equally as well. Farmers could decrease the stocking density and in doing so the investment on return might be better, and farmers could then gain the full benefit of compensatory growth.

 

 

The above graph shows that if birds are restricted they can catch up (given they have the chance or opportunity to do so). Birds show signs of compensatory growth at around 30 days and at around 37 days they have "caught" up.

 

Some personal trial data: In a trial conducted at Ukulinga Research farm between June and August 2000, evidence of compensatory growth in broilers was observed. Some birds were restricted to 80% of an ad-lib group until they reached 650g liveweight. These birds were fed a high spec diet (HP). Another group was fed a low spec diet (LP) ad lib. At 650g they were allocated to one of three groups, either given a choice (CH) between the HP and LP or given only LP or only HP. The results below were pooled for males and females.

 

Food intake and FCE at 950g Food

 

Treatment

Food

Intake

g/d

FCE

g gain/kg

feed

 

HP-HP

 

104

 

424

HP-LP

101

438

HP-CH

116

360

LP-HP

97

481

LP-LP

101

418

LP-CH

109

494

 

Food intake and FCE from 950g to 1250g Food

 

Treatment

Food

Intake

g/d

FCE

g gain/kg

feed

 

HP-HP

 

110

 

446

HP-LP

113

420

HP-CH

131

378

LP-HP

97

578

LP-LP

115

442

LP-CH

123

423

 

The results indicated that the birds that were previously fattened on the LP and then moved to a high spec diet ate less and were more efficient than those that remained on the LP diet. The birds that were also previously on the LP diet then given a choice were most efficient amongst the group from 650g to 950g liveweight.

 

However, in the stage from 950g to 1250g the birds that were on the LP diet then moved to the HP diet were most efficient amongst the group.

Gay Boomgaard

Nutec SA

Top

 

Avian Advice: University of Arkansas

 

The most recent edition of Avian Advice (Volume 5, Number 1) edit by Frank Jones the Extension Leader for the University of Arkansas Poultry Science department has proved to be a gold mine of useful information. I have included the summaries in this newsletter but visit the site at www.uark.edu/depts/posc/avianindex.html

 

Brooding Chicks and Poults: Environmental Critical Control Points

 

More flock performance is lost due to improper brooding than from any other single cause. Management during the first two to three weeks after hatch has a dramatic impact on bird performance throughout the remainder of the flock. Performance lost during the brooding period can never be regained. To brood properly pay particular attention to building setup. Heat should be on several hours prior to bird arrival to allow the floor to warm and prevent birds from becoming chilled. Set brooders at the proper temperature for each flock. Ventilation and air ex-change is critical to an optimum environment. Proper ventilation provides oxygen and removes carbon dioxide, ammonia, dust, disease organisms and humidity. Litter moisture can also be controlled through adequate ventilation. Maintaining optimum environmental conditions throughout the flock (and especially during the early brooding stage) coupled with a sound feed and water management program will help ensure production of a healthy, efficient and profitable flock.

 

Breeder Flock Uniformity:

 

How Important Is It?

Measuring flock uniformity is undoubtedly an important tool when evaluating the success of a pullet program. When a flock leaves the pullet house with a great deal of variation in body weight a series of conditions can often be expected to occur. The flock will often come into egg production slowly, since a disproportionate number of hens are not ready to produce eggs at the time of lighting. Early hatchability will also be less than expected because there will be an increase in early embryo mortality from those eggs laid by the lighter weight hens that mature slower. The flock, as a whole, will likely not attain the egg production peak expected because many of the hens are being either over or under fed at this crucial time in the production cycle. Finally, egg size will often continue to show considerable variation throughout the life of the flock which will not only reduce hatchability but may also affect the quality of the chick produced. Just how important is flock uniformity? Or should we be asking, what is more important than flock uniformity?

 

Early Feed Intake and Bird Performance

 

Feed intake is the single most important factor regulating performance of agricultural animals.

 

Feed intake controls the rate of output of all animal products and is the common denominator of efficiency, regardless if the output is meat, eggs, or reproduction. While numerous factors influence feed intake, as growers we control our own destiny when it comes to on-farm management practices. We must provide access to feed and water at all times. Feeder and drinker height must be adjusted and maintained at the proper level during the entire flock.

 

Temperature, humidity, ventilation, and ammonia must be kept within acceptable ranges; otherwise, feed intake and flock performance will suffer. Spending time in the chicken house is the only way to guarantee that all these needs are being met. Automatic controllers are marvellous inventions and allow us more flexibility than ever before. However, don’t let them take the place of you spending time in the chicken house. Today there is a substitute for almost everything except you being in the chicken house.

 

Tom Tabler & Keith Bramwell

University of Arkansas

 

Top

 

Eating Behaviour Of Pigs And Feeder

 

Understanding the eating behaviour of pigs can help producers maximise feed intake and, as a result, promote improved pig performance. Dr. Harold Gonyou, a scientist at the Prairie Swine Centre, Inc., in Saskatoon, Canada, studies behaviour in swine and provides some insight into the importance of understanding behaviour and how we can benefit from this.

 

Daily feed intake is the result of the total duration of eating (minutes per day) and the rate of eating (grams per minute). Because pigs eat multiple meals each day, the duration of eating is composed of a certain number of meals and the average duration of each of these meals. Any factor influencing the feeding behaviour of pigs influences feed intake and growth performance.

 

How often pigs eat is related to their age and size. Finishing pigs eat approximately 7 to 9 meals per day, nursery pigs eat more frequently, and recently weaned pigs eat 15 to 20 meals per day. Management factors also can influence meal frequency. Individually housed pigs eat more often than those in groups. As group size increases, eating frequency decreases.

 

Lightweight pigs eat more slowly than heavy pigs, and eating speed increases linearly as the pig gains weight. Additionally, pigs fed pelleted feeds eat faster than pigs fed meal diets, and they eat feed in a wet form fastest of all. Gonyou reported that pigs fed meal diets using wet/dry feeders spent 17 percent less time eating but consumed 5 percent more than pigs fed the same diet using dry feeders.

 

Group size also affects eating speed. Larger groups have greater competition, and eating speed increases. Gonyou reports that eating speed in growing-finishing pigs ranges from 15 grams per minute for small pigs consuming a meal diet to more than 120 grams per minute for pigs fed wet feed. Under commercial conditions, the maximum eating speed for large pigs appears to be approximately 45 grams per minute when they are fed from wet/dry feeders.

 

Total duration of eating is also affected by the size of the pig. Pigs weighing 22 kg spend more than 100 minutes per day eating, which drops to 70 minutes for pigs of 88 kg. Practically, the number of pigs that can eat from a single feeder space should increase as size increases because larger pigs spend less time eating than small pigs. Pigs adapt their eating behaviour depending on their social interactions (i.e. pecking order). When large groups of pigs are housed together, total eating duration decreases.

 

Understanding the eating behaviour of pigs will allow us to determine how many pigs we can feed from a single feeder space. A feeder space in this case would be one that is wide enough for the largest pig in the pen. The width of a feeder space has been defined as the shoulder width of the pig plus 10 percent to allow for variation in shape and movement. Thus the width of the feeding space for 5, 25, 50, and 115 kg pigs would be 11, 20, 25, and 32 cm, respectively.

 

The number of pigs that can be fed in an individual feeder space can be calculated as follows:

 

  1. The total time per day that the feeder is occupied. Gonyou suggests that a feeder occupancy rate of 80 percent should be appropriate and would likely support maximum growth performance.
  2. Consider the total eating duration. Using an eating duration of 60, 70, and 80 minutes per day per pig, the maximum number of pigs per feeder space would be 19, 16, and 14, respectively. (Remember the feeder should have an 80 percent occupancy)
  3. The addition of water to feed increases eating speed, therefore, the number of pigs per feeder space can be increased if pigs are fed from wet/dry feeders.

 

Note that the optimal number of pigs per feeder should be calculated based on the eating duration of the smallest pig at the feeder, because the total eating duration is the highest in small pigs. Thus the number of pigs that can be fed from one feeder space will be reduced.

Eric van Heugten

North Carolina State University

SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd.

Animal Nutrition Consultants

SPESFEED NEWS is published by the consultants at SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd. The purpose of the newsletter is two fold. It serves both as a source of information for those involved in animal agriculture as well as a means for us to maintain contact with out clients.

SPESFEED provides a professional technical service to the livestock and animal feed industries. Our aim is to ensure that our clients use optimal production and feeding systems in order to maximise the return on investment. The company has no affiliation to any particular product or supplier.

SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd

P O Box 48

Rivonia, 2128

South Africa

Tel + 27 11 803 2050