|
|
Summer 2007
Published by: SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201
Welcome
to the first newsletter of 2007. We trust that you have all had a peaceful
Christmas break.
As we have done in the past we have donated to the 2007
promises to be a busy year.
The AFMA Forum will be held at Sun City during March, and this years
VICTAM trade show, which will be held in May in The Netherlands, promises to be
bigger and better than ever. News
from SPESFEED is that we have changed our office facilities around a little. We
have remained in the same building but have moved to a smaller office suite.
A move is always difficult, but in this case, I believe there
are certain advantages to SPESFEED. We will be sharing resources with Afrisoft,
a software company owned by my brother Russell and his partner Roger Graham. News from our former college Shaun Storer is that he has managed to get himself married and ordained as a minister of religion – all within 2 month. Well done Shaun and good luck!
My
presence in It
all seem so clear to me at the time – I hope the rest of the audience
understood my talk better than the reporter did. SPESFEED
EXPRESS SPESFEED
EXPRESS, the Windows version of our feed formulation program is now shipping.
There
are differences from the version that we are all familiar with but the program
flow has remained the same.
The new program is faster and easier to use than ever – hence the
EXPRESS part of the name. There
will always be ways in which the functionality of the program can be improved,
and as always we would be only to happy to get feedback – positive or
negative. Importantly,
it will be possible to import all of your existing data libraries and client
file into SPESFEED EXPRESS, although moving platforms does offer the opportunity
of “cleaning out the attic” in as far as redundant data is concerned, so it
may well be advisable to start from scratch. Some
example screens appear on our website (www.spesfeed.co.za)
so feel free to have a look at them. We
will no longer be shipping or supporting the DOS version of the software, as
many of the newer operating systems (Window Vista for example) will not support
DOS software. We
will be holding a training
session/workshop for the new program on the 7th of March at the
Country Club at Woodmead. Our
intension is not only to demonstrate how the new program works, but also to help
people load the software and convert their data. The
cost will be R 450.00 (excluding VAT) for the day. Should
you be interested in attending please let us know soon as space will be limited. Poultry Nutrition
Course This
years Poultry Nutrition Course will be held at the Country Club at Woodmead from
the 17th to 19th of September.
We also intend to hold a one-day pig nutrition course on the 20th
of September but will only do this if the numbers justify it. Please
let Bianca know if you are interested in attending either course. “Kiss
of the hops” Poultry
scientists at the Susan
Watkins and co-workers conducted a feeding trial in which broiler diets
containing either hops or a growth-promoting antibiotic were compared along with
a control diet with neither treatment (International Journal of Poultry Science,
Vol. 5 pp. 134-136. 2006). Hops
serve as an antimicrobial to keep beer from spoiling, and there are a number of Their
findings indicated that addition of ground hops to poultry feed improved early
growth rate of broiler chicks and reduced the overall feed needed to produce a
pound of gain. Although the response
from the addition of hops was not as great as that obtained from the antibiotic
treatment, it was significantly greater than that of birds fed the control diet. The
workers report that this is the first “alternative product” that they have
tested in which a response of this magnitude was achieved.
Hops lend bitterness to beer might mean that it could possibly impart
some off flavours to the meat. Additional
research is needed to determine how consistent the response to hops might be
under more stringent growth conditions. Broilers and Anti-Biotics A
paper in the recent Journal of Applied Poultry Research, written by Griggs and
co-workers, deals with the issue of microbial safety of chickens raised in an
anti-biotic free system. They
report that in December 2002, a report published jointly by the Sierra Club
and the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy claimed that consumers
could reduce their exposure to antibiotic-resistant micro- organisms
by purchasing poultry products that were raised without antibiotics.
This claim was made without doing any research, seriously weakening the
assumption. The authors of this report set out to verify whether
there was any validity to this claim. It
was found that raising chickens without anti-biotics, especially when
the birds are kept outdoors, could result in higher levels of Campylobacter
and Salmonella contamination than in conventionally raised
chickens. In addition, the removal of antibiotics from chicken
feed has not been shown to reduce the incidence of anti-biotic resistance.
In the samples collected from chickens raised without antibiotics,
high levels of multiple antibiotic resistances were noted.
30
Pigs/Sow/Year At
this years Henrik
Jensen, a Danish farmer, reported that his unit that has
achieved high performance. It has consistently marketed 30 pigs/sow over the
last few years. This can only
be done where there is the genetic potential for very high litter size. Gilts
brought into the unit are purchased from a multiplier operating within the
Danbred breeding program, which is run by the Danish Bacon and Meat Council. Over
the 10 years to 2004, litter size in female nucleus herds (Landrace and Large
White), within the Danish breeding program, has increased by 3.5 total
born/litter with Landrace herds now averaging over 15 pigs per litter. In
addition to the genetic potential for litter size, there are a number of
important management practices essential for getting the required results:
been
made in just over two years. The biggest gains are yet to come, with the
injection of prolific genes into the multiplication units. Rick Kleyn
Feeding the young broiler chick The
young chick is not an “immature” broiler, but rather has unique requirements
in terms of its management, feeding and nutrition.
Birds that get off to a good start tend to perform better throughout the
production period. Whilst there is much that we still do not know or understand
about feeding the young chick, a considerable amount is known. It is these areas
that will be covered here. Feeding
the broiler during the first week of life represents a challenge for producers
and nutritionists. The bird has yet to develop fully from both physiological and
anatomical perspectives. The post-hatch nutrition of the broiler needs to take
cognisance of this fact. As the genotypes we use in commercial agriculture grow
faster, the growth achieved during the first 7 days of life represents an
ever-increasing proportion of the production cycle. The
production of a broiler with a good 7-day weight, with good uniformity and with
a sound skeleton is a not an unrealistic goal.
It is important to appreciate though, that the nutrition and management
of the young chick is a continuum. It
begins with the nutrition and health of the parent flock, moves through the egg
handling and hatching process, and then through to the nutrition and management
of the chick itself. These processes
may influence the efficiency of growth and ultimate profitability. Little
is know about the effect of marginal levels of nutrient reserve (brought about
by feed restriction) and its impact on the quality of the egg, fertility, embryo
viability or chick quality.
Dietary protein is not believed to play a significant role on chick
quality. Mineral excesses and deficiencies have been associated with embryo
mortality, but there is little reference to chick performance and transfer of
antibodies from parent to the chick.
Zinc and Selenium have been implicated in improving maternal antibody
transfer and chick quality.
The dietary inclusion of vitamins has a significant effect on fertility
and embryo viability. Specific fat-soluble vitamins (ß-carotene
and Vitamin E) can increase lymphocyte proliferation and the ability to mount an
immune response. Ferket
has demonstrated that in ovo feeding
(injecting a solution into the embryonic amnion
of hatching eggs at day 18 of incubation), increased the nutrient reserves for
embryos and chicks and stimulated more rapid maturation of the GIT post hatch.
The full implication of this technology has yet to be explored, but the
development of equipment to carry out the process automatically will accelerate
research in this field. Hatch
Day: Represents
the time when the chick
must make the transition from the energy supplied by the yolk (endogenous) to
the utilisation of carbohydrate-rich feed (exogenous) through the intestine, at
which time dramatic changes occur to the size, morphology, and function of the
intestine.
Under
natural conditions, chicks will forage for food soon after hatching, which is
not possible in a hatchery. Withholding feed from chicks results in a body
weight loss because of moisture loss and yolk utilisation.
Ross Breeders report that by delaying placement by 15 hours, 7-day weight was
reduced by 20 g and 40-day weight by 80 g. At hatch, the chick is immature with regards the development the GIT, immune system and thermo-regulatory system. These areas need to develop: Anatomical
development:
At the time of hatching, the cells lining the GIT
(the enterocytes) of the small intestine are round and immature.
These form the finger like villi that are essential for nutrient uptake. Access
to nutrients initiates growth about 24 hours after first ingesting food, with both
the number and size (height) of the villi increasing. The weights of the
gizzard, proventriculus, and small intestine increase more when compared the
other organs. This enhanced growth rate reaches its maximum between day 4 and 8
of age. Enzymatic
Development:
The secretion of enzymes by the pancreas and the small intestine are low at the
time of hatch. The secretion of pancreatic enzymes is triggered by feed intake.
Pancreatic amylase activity increases 3 fold from Development
of GIT microflora:
The chick hatches with what
is effectively a sterile GIT and the early post-hatch stage is critical for the
establishment of GIT microbial community. The micro-organisms that colonise the
GIT during the early post-hatch period form a synergistic relationship with
their poultry host.
By day 3, significant numbers of faecal
streptococci and coliforms
have been isolated so colonisation begins very soon after hatching.
The microflora is fully established in the small intestine by 2 weeks of
age and the manner in which we manage the birds can determine whether the
micro-flora is “good” (the lactobacilli) or bad (the anaerobic faecal
streptococci, clostridia, enterobacteria). The
immune system: The
GIT is the largest lymphoid tissue in the body, making it an integral part of
the immune system. The gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), has evolved to
provide protection against pathogens encountered in the GIT.
Fasting chicks post hatch impairs development of the Bursa of Fabricius. The thermo-regulatory system: Function of the thermo-regulatory system has a direct bearing on nutrient utilisation and feed intake, and thus forms an important part of any discussion on the nutrition of the young chick. Birds
are homoeothermic and have a highly developed control system for the regulation
of both heat production and heat loss. These
two processes maintain the chick in a thermal comfort zone, which is the
temperature at which the metabolic rate is minimal and the homoeothermic state
is maintained at the lowest energy cost. This
maximises amount of net energy available for productive purposes. In
practical terms, chicks maintained at too low a temperature will huddle in an
attempt to reduce their heat loss into the environment. Consequently, they visit
feed and water points less often, reducing their intake of both. High
temperatures also impact on in feed intake.
Birds will move away from the heat source, which is often where the
feeding stations are. They also
strive to reduce the level of heat production brought about by nutrient
metabolism Importantly,
early access to nutrients triggers the development of all aspects of the GIT. Practical
Nutrition and Feeding:
Both energy and amino acid
utilisation are compromised for at least the first ten days of the chicks life.
How best do we feed the recently hatched broiler chick? Bear in mind that we
wish to maximize the development of the GIT and the immune system, achieve a
good 7-day weight and still make money. Figure
1: Changes in Lysine digestibility as chicks age (after Batal and Parsons, 2002)
The
tactics that we can employ in practice mostly involve ensuring that the birds
consume and metabolise as much nutrient as possible:
Much
of the responsibility for the improvement in feed intake lies with the farm
manager. Figure 2: The
relationship between water intake and weight gain.
Both
the particle size of feed ingredients as well as the physical form of the diet
itself needs to be considered. Particle size should be between 500 and 600 µm
for the first 7 days of the broiler life.
Ideally, feed should be fed as a uniform crumble, between 1 and 2mm in
diameter. The level of fines in the
diet should be minimal. Alternatively,
use a mini-pellet, but take care that they are not too big (long) as this
inhibits feed intake. Dietary
Nutrient Specification:
The bird’s nutrient uptake will increase by increasing the nutrient
content of the diet.
Modern broiler genotypes have the ability to respond to and utilize the
amino acids in an almost linear manner (Figure 3). The decision that needs to
made, is not what level of amino acid should be included in the diet, but rather
what level of amino acid will give us the best return. This decision is
complicated by the fact that the level of protein offered to young birds,
impacts on their lifetime performance.
Moreover, any delay in body weight gain brought about by suboptimal ideal
protein levels in the starter diet, is only partially compensated for in later
in life. Other aspects of the specification of chick diets do bear some discussion. Sodium is required for the absorption of glucose and methionine. It also stimulates water and feed intake. Weight gain is maximized at considerably higher sodium level than are traditionally used in broiler diets. It is of interest that excreta moisture levels only increased by a few percentage points. Figure 3: Response of
broilers (1 to 7 days) to sodium levels in the diet (Maiorka
et al., 2004)
Choice
of ingredients:
The choice of ingredients
should be addressed from the perspective of formulating to maximize the
availability of nutrients, especially carbohydrates, as opposed to formulating
to meet a published set of energy or amino acid levels. Firstly,
ensure
that all ingredients meet normal quality control standards, with regards their
visual appearance, taste, smell and physical form. Secondly, improve
digestibility by eliminating indigestible components form the diet. Grain low in
non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) lead to improved results in young birds (maize
vs. wheat). Reducing the NSP level in maize by de-germing and de-hulling it
(mealie meal), resulted in significant
improvements in weight at 17 days of age as well as an improvement in dry matter
retention. Interestingly, gelatinising (cooking) the starch in maize did not
improve chick performance. Soybean
meal containing low NSP levels and higher protein levels resulted in the higher
feed intake, weight gains and improved feed conversion efficiency. Lastly,
it would make little sense to use ingredients high in ash in the diets of young
birds. For example, a 72% protein fishmeal contains about half the ash that a
60% protein fishmeal would contain. Thus, the prudent nutritionist would use
high quality fishmeal in starter diets. Table:
Overview of the steps required to maximize young chick development.
Rick Kleyn
Protein
and Amino Acid levels in Layer Diets I
have recently come across some Brazilian work – published in Portuguese but
with English abstract and tables (Pavan et
al., R. Bras. Zootec., 34,
568-574), which is of interest. They
examined the effect of feeding differing levels of Crude Protein (CP) and
total sulphur amino acids (TSAA) on egg production, egg quality and
nitrogen excretion in brown hens (ISA Browns).
It was demonstrated that hens
will respond to increasing levels of amino acid in the diet, but that simply
increasing the protein levels had no effect, other than increasing the level of
nitrogenous waste in the manure. Three
CP levels (140, 155 and 170 g/kg) together with 3 TSAA levels (5.7, 6.4 and 7.1
g/kg) were used. The birds were 52 weeks old and the experiment ran for 140
days. The diets appear to be similar
to those used in It
was not possible to appreciate from the discussion or from the manner in which
the results were presented whether the correct method of statistical analysis
was used. No consolidated data for
each factors or interactions were shown, indicating that the data may not have
been analysed multi-factorally. It
was reported that there were no significant differences in feed consumption, egg
production, broken eggs, egg mass, feed efficiency or mortality. Significant
differences were reported for the percentages of yolk and albumen of the eggs.
In addition, it was concluded that a diet containing 140 g/kg of CP and
5.7 g/kg of TSAA could be used without causing a decrease in performance.
Nitrogen excretion was significantly higher for the layers fed with a 170 g/kg
CP diet. Firstly,
there is a definite response in egg number, egg weight and egg output to
increasing level of TSAA in the diet (as would be expected for increasing level
of the first limiting amino acid). It should thus be possible to select to a
level that would result in maximum economic return. This would be especially
true if a premium was realised for larger and extra large eggs. Table
1: Summary data for response to different levels of TSAA in the diet.
When
examining the effect of protein level in the diet, it will be observed that
there may well be negative trends (other than an increase in the nitrogen
content of the manure). These data were not submitted to statistical analysis;
however, it would perhaps be safe to say that there was no effect of increasing
the protein level of a layer diet. Table
2: Summary data for response to different levels of CP in the diet.
Pavan
et al. (2006)
Effect
of the Processing of Full Fat Soya on Broiler Performance In
more Brazilian work, Brito et al., (R.
Bras. Zootec., 35, 457-461) examined the effect of the processing of Extruded
Full Fat Soya (EFFS), with or without the addition of an enzyme complex on
broiler performance. It was found that both under and over processing of EFFS
negatively impacted on broiler performance, while the addition of the enzyme has
a positive effect. The
different extruded full fat soybeans (EFFS) used were under processed (91% KOH
and 0.5 Urease), standard (88% KOH and 0.05 Urease) and over processed (66% KOH
and 0.005% Urease). The multi-enzymatic complex was composed of cellulase,
amylase, and protease. As
expected, the addition of the enzyme complex had no effect on either KOH or
Urease values of the ingredients. The
diet used contained 34% Full Fat
Soya, which is a higher inclusion that most South African nutritionists are
comfortable with, so the results reported on below may be slightly exaggerated. From
the tables below, it can be seen that broiler performance was negatively
impacted on by both the under and over cooked EFFS, clearly demonstrating just
how important it is to correctly cook any full fat soya that is to be used in
broiler diets Table
1: The effect of Full Fat Soya
processing on broiler performance 1 to 21 days.
Table
2: The
effect of using an enzyme complex on broiler performance 1 to 21 days.
This
experiment highlights just how sensitive broilers, in particular, are to the
inclusion of incorrectly process EFFS. I
believe that by using a simple test such as the Cresol red test, manufacturers
can test the quality of their product on an ongoing basis (I know one who does
this every hour on the hour). Alternatively, feed millers should be testing
every load of Full Fat, as it is delivered – using more than a single sample.
In addition, this experiment would indicate that the inclusion of enzymes did
improve performance. Whether this is
cost effective or not would need to be determined. Brito
et al., (2006)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|