|
|
Spring 2006
Published by: SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201
When
I put pen to paper for the last edition of SPESFEED News I predicted that the
maize market could be “interesting” in the months ahead.
The truth is that few of us expected the This needs to be viewed against
a background of expansion in all forms of intensive animal production and the
likely effect this may have on product prices.
On the positive side, the price of both beef and mutton has been high and
the cost of importing meat products will have increased in sympathy with the
weakening By coincidence, this edition of the SPESFEED News has much to do with gut health, both in broilers and in pigs. This topic has assumed considerable importance to producers in both sectors. Biofuels The
production of Biofuel is likely to have an impact on the animal feed industry
both locally and globally. Those of
us involved in agribusiness need to be aware of the impact it may have on our
businesses. I have associated with
alternative energy sources since my father built a solar water heater in the
1960’s. As a boy, I found myself
climbing around in the roof lagging pipes and being abused for having 5 thumbs
on each hand. Despite this, I
managed to develop an enduring interest in alternative energy sources.
I have recently been studying internet sites that show you how to build a
bio diesel plant in your kitchen (it is that simple). So what has this to do with our
industry? The truth is that there is
increasing pressure on governments and individuals to use alternative or
renewable energy sources. Not only is there concern that the supply of fossil
fuel is limited, but there is also a real concern about the emission of
greenhouse gases and global warming. There is a worldwide trend towards the
production of energy from alternative sources. The use of solar energy is well
established, clean but relatively expensive. I have a solar lighting system in
my cottage on the farm which works well, but has some limitations with regards
any application that requires serous power.
In short, we need to find an alternative to fossil fuel to meet the
energy demand for things like cars, heating and refrigeration. The second alternative is the
production of biodiesel from fats and oils. Sasol is investigating building a
plant for the production of biodiesel using soybeans.
However, it is possible to use oil from sunflowers, used restaurant
grease and fat and other sources to produce biodiesel.
The British supermarket chain ASDA is investigating turning the fat
derived from their chicken roasteries into biodiesel.
They may not sell this fat for use in animal feed and shortly they will
not be able to dump it in landfills. The developments in the move to more biofuel production will have an impact on our industry in a number of ways:
Glycerine,
one of the by-products of biodiesel product can be used in soap and cosmetic
manufacture. Supply will probably
shortly outstrip demand though. Recent work at the
Rick
Kleyn "Feed
passage," or, more accurately, the passage of undigested feed in the faeces
of broilers, continues to be reported. In the past its occurrence has been
linked to the feeding of poor grain, but this is not the only cause.
Several factors may work in concert and limit the broiler's ability to
digest and/or absorb feed. Investigation of the cause(s) requires gross
examination of the affected poultry. This
entails either true diagnostic work, or more often, subjective observation. Symptoms
include the passing undigested feed in the faeces.
This includes large grain particles, excess moisture, a characteristic
green colouration with orange mucus, and poor formation to the faeces. Affected
broilers have poor pigmentation, poor feed conversion, and lower body weights
with variable uniformity. On necropsy, lesions are commonly found in the
proventriculus and gizzard of affected broilers. They are also found in the
small intestines. The
severity and clinical manifestations of the disease vary depending on management
practices, presence of concurrent diseases, and specific shipments of grain. A
series of factors need to be considered when passage of undigested feed is to be
investigated. Feed
passage syndrome in broilers can be defined as "the passage of nutrients in
faeces due to improper digestion and/or absorption in the intestines." The
cause of the syndrome is the broiler's inability to digest or to absorb the
feed, or both. The syndrome may result from a single factor or a combination of
factors. Many
infectious and nutritional diseases cause primary lesions in the gut. Feed
passage is a general term not associated with a specific disease syndrome but
rather occurs during many diseases. Feed passage results from some abnormality
in the digestion and absorption of nutrients, and although the causes may be
numerous, the clinical expression in the broiler is simply feed passage. Heat
Stress:
This
causes broilers to increase water consumption in an effort to cool down. Much of
it will be voided in the faeces, causing them to be wet and poorly formed.
Physical changes in the intestinal lining can be detected histologically within
48 hours of heat stress and can be observed for at least 3 days. Changes include
a decrease in villus length and surface area. Dietary
Salt Intake:
An increase in salt consumption, in the feed or water, causes birds to consume
additional water to assist in its elimination. This is voided by way of the
faeces, resulting in them being wet and poorly formed. Ascarids
and Cestodes:
Intestinal
parasites can irritate the gut and cause passage of undigested feed. A mild
infestation of ascarids is enough to cause irritation and feed passage. A
significant cestode infection must occur before losses are recognized. Viral
Infections:
A number of
viruses, including reovirus, calicivirus,
adenovirus, parvovirus, enterovirus,
coronavirus, and togavirus are
associated with broiler feed passage. Historically, reovirus
has been considered a primary viral cause of broiler feed passage or
"malabsorption syndrome." However, it is now clear that this virus
does not play a significant role. Some investigators have described this virus
as "one in search of a disease" as it is wrongly blamed for many
syndromes in poultry. Bacterial
Infections:
Bacterial
enteritis often occurs secondary to viral or coccidial infections. The
intestinal tract houses a large bacterial population that is necessary for its
normal gut function. An imbalance in this flora can result in disease.
Prevention is best achieved with effective use of growth promoters, control of
coccidial infections, protection of immune system integrity, and biosecurity
practices. A specific bacterial infection in the gut that is increasing in incidence in recent years is Necrotic Enteritis (NE), caused by C. perfringens. This bacterium is common in the environment and is considered part of the normal gut flora of poultry. A number of predisposing factors are recognized;
Tannins:
Tannic
acid is found in the coatings of grains, especially some varieties of sorghum.
Toxic levels of tannins in the feed cause oesophageal and gastric oedema,
hemorrhagic ulceration, necrosis and sloughing of the mucosal lining, hyper
secretion of mucin, and crop wall thickening. This damage results in feed
passage. Biogenic
Amines:
Are present in low levels in animals, plants, and micro-organisms. At
higher concentrations they are toxic. They cause more problems in hot weather
when there is increased bacterial degradation of free amino acids, dietary
proteins, and animal by-products. Lesions associated with feeding toxic levels
of biogenic amines include proventricular enlargement, gizzard erosion,
sloughing of intestinal epithelia, poor weight gain and feed conversion,
impaired immune response, and diarrhoea. Affected birds are poorly pigmented and
have low body weights and FCR conversions. Gizzerozine:
This
toxin is produced in over-processed fishmeal. It has an effect similar to the
biogenic amine, histamine, in causing overproduction of hydrochloric acid in the
proventriculus and resulting gizzard erosion. Rancid
Fats:
Rancid fats are a
common cause of feed passage, especially in hotter climates where fats readily
become rancid if not stored properly. The process involves the oxidizing of
dietary fat and fat-soluble compounds to produce free radicals or reactive
oxygen molecules. Examples include the surperoxide radical (O2) and
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Lesions
include proventriculitis, gizzard erosions, and enteritis. Impaired immunity,
poor growth, poor feed conversion and poor pigmentation may occur. Litter
Quality:
Litter is often
consumed by chicks before they find feed and water. Ensure
litter is of high quality, free from foreign materials, and fresh. Ingestion
of contaminated litter can cause irritation of the gut linings of the young
chick, resulting in poor nutrient absorption. Management
practices can play a major role in preventing feed passage. It directly affects
the most important broiler economic performance parameters, feed conversion and
body weight. When feed passage is observed in broiler houses, evaluating basic
management practices may be the most efficient manner to resolve the problem.
G.
Butcher, A. Nilipour, R. Miles Balanced
Protein, Pellets and Mash in Broilers In
a recently published paper Lemme and his co-workers examined the response of
broilers to increased levels of balanced protein (BP) offered as either a coarse
mash or as pellets of varying quality. Bird
performance levels can be improved by increasing BP levels, where BP is defined
as the whole balanced amino acid profile. However,
response to BP may be limited by other nutritional, environmental or management
factors, and it was hypothesised that feed form, particle size and the use of
certain ingredients may be among those factors.
These
diets represented 90, 100,110 and 120% of the CVB (2000) recommendation. Table:
Summary of the composition of the diets used in experiment 1
In
experiment 1, diets were fed either as coarse mash, poor pellets or good
pellets. Good pellets were
characterised by high durability. In
the second experiment, diets were fed as either good quality pellets or coarse
mash. In the case of the mash,
particle size distribution was either kept constant with increasing BP, or
changed by increasing the proportion of soybean meal. All
of the results achieved exceeded the Ross recommendation. All effects that
measured in both experiments were significant.
Feed intake generally decreased with increasing BP and that feed intake
was highest in the case of good pellets and lowest in mash fed birds. Although
there was a small response in weight gain of mash fed birds, feed conversion
improved substantially for all feed forms with increasing BP.
In experiment 2, particle size distribution in the mash made no
difference to bird performance. There was an almost linear decrease in abdominal
fat content indicating improvements in energy use with increasing BP levels. The
data from both experiments would suggest that regardless of the physical feed
form, increasing BP levels to up to 120% of the current CVB recommendations had
beneficial effects on broiler performance. When
pellets of poor quality are fed, higher levels of BP are required to achieve the
same performance levels. Lemme,
Wijtten, van Wichen, Petri and Langhout (Poultry Science 85: 721 -730)
Figure: Feed intake, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio responses to increasing levels of balanced protein offered as coarse mash, poor quality pellets, and good quality pellets.
Post Weaning
Syndrome in Piglets An
important aspect of the resistance in the gut against PWS is a diverse and
stabile microflora, by which ‘competitive exclusion’ is generated and growth
and attachment of (pathogenic) bacteria is counteracted. Newly weaned piglets
may suffer from PWS because of the immature development of the gut and
inadequate capacity to digest a ‘vegetable’ diet. Gut damage is also caused
by the weaning process. As a result, the colonization resistance is disturbed
and E. coli can
proliferate and attach to the enterocytes. In
newly weaned piglets the gut can be damaged by the reduced feed intake
immediately post weaning and the
subsequent increase in the their susceptibility to infections like Specific measures
with regards feed composition and feeding strategy are discussed. These may have
variable effects under practical conditions. Improvement of gut development and
prevention of gut damage at weaning:
When
weaning occurs around three to four weeks of age, it takes 10–14 days before
gut development matures enough to digest vegetable diets. In addition, the
villus height is impaired because of low feed intake, infection, stress etc.
Feed and hence energy intake is often below the maintenance requirement for the
five days after weaning. Thereafter feed intake increases but gut development
remains inadequate. This
creates an overload on the digestive system.
Improvement of digestion and absorption in the gut, reduction of the amount of substrate: The impaired digestive and absorptive function of the gut can (partly) be compensated by the provision of highly digestible diets or by the addition of supplements stimulating digestion. These measures diminish the amount of substrate and reduce the risk of bacterial growth. The following can support improvement of the digestibility:
Inhibition
of the growth of pathogenic bacteria: Growth of Enterobacteriaceae like E. coli is inhibited below pH 4 (acid). Because of the faecal-oral recontamination, the stomach plays an important role in the infection cycle and an adequate function of the stomach. Additives like organic acids and other measures with bacteriostatic or bacteriocidic may be used:
Improvement of colonization resistance: A diverse and stabile microflora can prevent the growth and attachment of pathogenic bacteria. Bacteria regarded as beneficial create a less favourable gut environment or Enterobacteriaceae. Lactobacillae are regarded as positive bacteria as they produce lactic acid and bacteriocins which suppress the growth of E. coli. Improvement of colonisation resistance can be achieved as follows:
Decrease the attachment of bacteria and increase immune response: Certain additives reduce the attachment of bacteria to enterocytes. The systemic and local immune response can be influenced by certain nutrients.
Many of the feed additives
mentioned- enzymes, probiotics, nucleotides etc. - have variable effects under
practical conditions. Factors influencing the effectiveness of these feed
additives are the nature and amount of the substrate in the diet, the effective
pH in the digestive tract, housing conditions and infection pressure from the
environment. More insight and research is required for an appropriate evaluation
and practical application of the measures mentioned. Drikzwager,
Veldman and Bikker Animal Research: 54 231 -236 In September I was fortunate
enough to attend two back-to-back conferences in
Dr
Nick Dale from
Dr Jim McAdam of Aviagen presented data on where the Ross breed has come from and where it is likely to go to infuture. Although most of us have seen information of this sort in the past, it does not look as if we have reached a
Rick Kleyn
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|