|
|
Winter 2005
Published by: SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201
In
my last editorial I expressed a desire to spend more time in We
have a new addition to the technical team at SPESFEED.
Colleen Englbrecht, who worked for us for a few years before her husband
was transferred to
Poultry
Nutrition Course For the first time in 13 years we have had to delay the poultry course that was to have been held in February to a date in October (3rd to 5th). This is the same week that the WPSA scientific day and AFMA forum. Please contact Bianca if you wish to attend.
Hubbard
in ISA Hubbard in
After a break of many
years both the Hubbard broiler (The Highflex) and the ISA Brown layer will be
available in My
experience with the Hubbard in
Commercial
Poultry Nutrition 3rd Edition. Steve Leeson and John Summers have just brought out the third edition of their very popular book ‘Commercial Poultry Nutrition’. The book has been completely revamped and updated. A new layout makes it far easier to read and it now contains far more information than the previous edition.
In their foreword the authors make the following statement: “The first edition of this book was published in 1991, while the second edition followed in 1997. It has been an interesting exercise to follow the development of poultry production over this time, and to encapsulate ideas of associated changes in nutrition and feeding management.” This pretty much sets the tone of the new edition. Many of the basics are still the same, but there have certainly been new developments and a change in emphasis in many areas.
In my opinion it is a must have for any nutritionist or poultry producer. SPESFEED have imported a number of copies for our clients (the bulk shipping makes it far cheaper), and we will be offering them for sale at a price of about R 600.00, (excluding VAT), depending on the exchange rate. Please contact Bianca if you would like a copy.
Schering-Plough IDEA conference
In March I was invited to attend a technical seminar, organised by
Schering-Plough, in
Use of the Paracox vaccine is said to be a technique that only causes low levels of stress in the bird. It is the additional stresses of poor management and inadequate feeding programs that result in the multiple stresses that the birds do not handle well.
In addition, there is little doubt that the ionophores that we use for coccidiosis control also have a mild anti-biotic/growth promoting effect. Thus, when they are removed from the diet, together with the AGP’s, additional stress is placed on the gut of the bird. For this reason the make-up of the diet requires scrutiny.
In broad terms the IDEA concept can be spelt out as follows:
I – Impulse: This stands for the impulse that the birds need to be given from day old through to the end of the starter period (14 days). This has to do with the development of the gut (physiologically), the development of the immune system and the development of a healthy gut micro flora.
Dr. Andrea Machado Leal Ribeiro,
a colleague of Mario Penz who is
well known in South Africa, presented
a paper entitled ‘Maximizing development of the Intestinal Tract and Immune System’.
Some very interesting data was presented but I was unable to take notes
fast enough to use any of the data here. We have been promised a copy of the
paper, and when I receive mine I will be able to carry some of the information
in the SPESFEED News.
Marcus Kenny from Aviagen (Ross Breeders) was able to demonstrate just how
important getting birds off to a good start is, in terms of their future
performance.
D – Digestibility: This has to do with increasing the digestibility of the diet as a whole. It is during what we would call the Grower period that Necrotic Enteritis (NE) rears its ugly head in non-medicated broilers, and the presence of any undigested food components leads to a proliferation of the Clostridium perfringens bacteria, which are known to be the root cause of NE.
If one looks at digestibility from the perspective of NE, then it makes sense to be concerned about the digestibility of the grower diet. As nutritionists we know that it is equally as important that the diet be digestible in the period immediately post hatch.
Steve Leeson was to have addressed this issue in his paper, but sadly he had the ‘flu and could not travel. In communicating with him subsequently, he told me that he was to have dealt with the ‘indigestibilities’ contained in the feed and how best to deal with them.
E
– Economics: Obviously
the economics of both the feeding program and the use of the vaccination need to
be looked into. Dr.
Barragan, a poultry consultant from
Dr. Robert Teeter of the
A – Advances: New alternatives and advances in nutrition continually need to be examined. In my opinion, this aspect was not well covered during the meeting. Some of the holes in our knowledge base could have been identified and/or discussed.
For example, it is know that nearly 90% of all of the enteric bacteria species in the gut of the chicken has yet to be identified. Surely if you are interested in gut health this is an area that requires further funding and research?
Another possible avenue of research would be the use of Nucleotides (see SPESFEED News Summer 2004). Nucleotides have been demonstrated to improve the villi development in the gut, but also to boost the immune response. They would have a role to play in birds that are vaccinated against coccidiosis at day old. All in all, the meeting was excellent. I learnt a lot and have been forced to re-think how I would feed broilers, particularly drug free broilers, in a different light. The IDEA concept is sound and if applied will lead to better production. I am not sure that specific times should be attached to any of the components. Rather, each of the aspects needs to be considered at all times when designing broiler diets.
Thank you to Schering-Plough for making it possible. Rick
Kleyn
Challenges
in feeding the modern sow
As recently as 25 years ago, it was relatively easy to feed replacement females
in a commercial piggery. They could
be reared to first service on a normal finisher diet and a single diet was fed
to dry and lactating sows. Whilst
the dry sow diet has not changed dramatically over the last twenty years,
rearing the modern gilt and catering for the demand on the lactating sow has
required the development of special feeds for these animals.
The challenge in feeding gilts and sows is largely influenced by genotype of the animals, general environment, management and disease status of the herd under consideration. The Nutritionist is required to design feeds that give optimum performance for a given set of these influences and often decisions need to be made on subjective assessments. Fairly good information exists on nutrient requirements for changes in environmental temperature and humidity, but there is little consensus on the nutrient partitioning in animals that need to mount an immune response to a disease challenge. All the feeds then need to be designed to give maximum profitability per piglet weaned per sow per year.
Most recommendations advocate an ad
libitum feeding schedule up to ovulation and subsequent mating, but genotype
must be considered when using such a strategy. If gilts become too fat, either a
reduction in diet density or physical feed restriction may be necessary.
Years of selection for low fat levels in pigs, improved growth rates and
better feed conversion have reduced feed intakes and compromised the breeding
ability of sows. However, feeding to
maximum protein gain improves ovulation rate in gilts and the suggested optimum
criteria for age and body composition at sexual maturity are:
For practical purposes, monitor the P2 and body weight of gilts to
achieve the best results on your farm (table 1).
Control feed to influence lean and fat growth in the body (2.5 to 4.5 kg
feed/gilt per day) and flush feed (i.e. feed ad
libitum) for two weeks prior to mating to achieve optimum ovulation rate.
Table 1. The performance of sows
according to body weight and P2 value at first mating (Challinor et al., 1996)
*Only
sows that achieved 5 parities Energy
intake during gestation remains the most important nutrient in monitoring
maternal weight change. Changes in P2
in response to energy intake are less clear although there is usually an
increase in P2 during early to mid-gestation and then a decrease
during the final stages of pregnancy. Embryo
survival (ES) is a complex phenomenon and the critical time is during the first
21 days of pregnancy. High feed
intake (energy levels) during this time can be detrimental to embryo survival
and ultimate litter size (table 2). Table 2.
Effect of feed intake between mating and 30 days post coitum (BSAP, 1983)
A
7.7% reduction in ES % Typical
dry sow diets are 13.0 MJ/kg DE, with crude protein of 140 g/kg and a Lysine: DE
of 0.5. Depending on environmental
temperature and humidity, feeding levels from 2.0 kg’s to 2.5 kg’s per sow
per day are recommended and increasing feeding levels 2 to 3 weeks pre-partum
may have a positive influence on piglet birth weight.
Several reviews suggest that piglet weight increases by about 8 g for
each 1 MJ/kg increase in DE per day up to a maximum piglet birth weight of
around 1.4 kg’s. The
lactating sow Typical
lactating rations are high in energy and protein with a DE value of 13.8 MJ/kg,
lysine: DE of 0.64 and a protein value of 190 g/kg on an as-fed basis.
High, nutrient-dense diets are often low in fibre and recent work
suggests that use of purified fibres reduces incidence of MMA (mastitis,
metritis, agalactia) in lactating sow rations.
Modern feeding strategy encourages feed intakes to be as high as possible
after 7 to 10 days post partum and ideal conditions for the sow to achieve this
are:
Several
lactation feeding systems have been proposed and figure 1 shows a suggested
practical feed intake. The Nottingham
System is based on 1.8 kg’s feed for the sow and 0.5 kg’s for each
piglet suckled. Food is introduced
at a rate of 2 kg’s on day one and increased by 0.5 kg’s per day until
maximum has been achieved. The Stotfold Feeding Strategy developed by Baker, based on the work of
Close suggests feeding a standard scale to 10 days post partum.
Sows are offered 2.5 kg’s on day 1, increasing by 0.5 kg’s to 7
kg’s on day 10 and thereafter fed individually to litter size and piglet
weight. NRM,
I
have recently come across a paper published by Brazilian scientists (de Brum,
Penz, Guidoni, Albino and Fialho): all in Portuguese. Using the English
abstract, an internet dictionary and the friendly fellow at the corner shop (who
comes from They
report on an experiment in which broiler breeders were fed diets differing in
protein and lysine level from the onset of lay until the laying period had been
completed. Using some of the results, I have been able to do some of my own
calculations which I have included in the tables. In
essence, two strains of breeds -the EMBRAPA and the Arbor Acre - were used in
the trial. The birds were then fed
diets containing different protein and amino acid levels, but the same energy
level (Table 1). An identical
feeding program was used for all of the birds in the experiment.
What I did find a little puzzling is that the Methionine level (3.5 g/kg)
was kept constant in all treatment. Table 1:
Nutrient Levels of the Diets used in the Experiment.
In
table 2. I have included some of the more salient details of the feeding
program, together with the calculated protein and Lysine intakes (my own
calculation). Table
2: Crude protein (g/bird day) and
lysine (mg/bird day) intake at various times during the feeding program.
Of
interest to the nutritionist is that the Lysine intake ranges from 826 mg/bird
per to more than double this amount at 1683 mg/bird day. The
production results are shown the tables that follow. Table 3:
Body weight (grams) of the birds at different ages
As
can be seen there were no significant differences in the body weights.
In addition, it was shown that there were no differences in carcass
composition at 56 weeks of age. Table 4:
Cumulative egg number and egg weight (grams) of the birds at different
ages
Although
numerically different at 56 weeks of age, the increased production in the birds
on the 18% diet was statistically significant.
There was a significant difference in the egg size at 32 weeks of age,
with the birds on the 16.5 and the 18% diets both producing slightly larger
eggs. By 36 weeks of age this had
normalised. The
authors concluded that the protein level of the diet did not affect the total
number of eggs produced, bird live weight or carcass composition and that it was
possible to use diets containing as little as 12% protein for breeder hens from
the 24 to 56 weeks of age. There
were no differences between strains. What,
then, does this experiment mean to us? The
first issue to be dealt with is that of the strain of bird used in the
experiment. It is true that neither
strain is used in In
broad terms production remained the same at all levels of protein in the diet.
This confirms my own opinion that we consistently overfeed broiler
breeders all amino acids. A lysine intake of 980 mg/day is far higher than the
level we feed commercial laying hens which although smaller, produce
considerably more eggs. It
was a little surprising to me that all the birds had similar body weights,
carcass composition and egg weights. I
would have expected the higher protein diets to have resulted in heavier, leaner
birds that produced bigger eggs.
Mycoplasma
gallisepticum (Mg) is one of the major challenges facing the poultry industry at
the moment. Mg is one of the
smallest bacteria, possesses no cell wall, has very modest genetic material and
cannot survive very long outside the host; yet it can cause significant
production losses in poultry. Clinical
Symptoms Mg
is typically a disease of the upper respiratory tract and at the onset of the
disease a slight snick is heard. The
outcome of the disease depends upon climatic conditions as well as the presence
of other pathogens. The incubation
period of the disease is long - typically 2-3 weeks. The
current strain of Mg appears to be very virulent and the main losses occur
through mortality. In commercial
layer there appears to be a shift from the chronic airsacculitis to a more acute
mortality syndrome. Mortality
typically starts when the birds are nearing peak production (22-26 weeks), and
losses of up to 4% per week have been seen.
Egg production is usually not severely affected and drop in production is
seldom more than 5%. Broilers
are also severely affected and in uncontrolled complicated cases, the mortality
can reach up to 20%, with most of the birds dying at 30 days of age.
Growth can be depressed by as much as 150 grams at term and FCR
deteriorates, mainly as results of high late mortality and poor growth. Spread
of the organism Vertical
transmission plays an important role in the transmission of the disease.
Although the rate of transmission can be very small (2-6%), it ensures
the organism is transmitted from one generation to the next.
Mg will survive in the host despite the presence of antibodies and birds
will remain carriers for a long time.
Mg
does not spread quickly through a house. This is often reflected by the increase
in percentage of positive blood tests that are found when a house is bled over a
period of time. This has
implications for medication and could explain why the disease appears to recur
when medication is stopped. Mycoplasma
synovium, on the other hand, spreads very quickly through a house. Mg
can be carried on the human mucous membrane of the eyes and nose, it will
however only survive there for a very short time (24hrs). Diagnosis
of Mg The diagnosis of the disease is not always as straightforward as it seems, the following methods are currently available:
Vaccination
complicates the diagnosis of Mg as it is difficult to distinguish between
vaccine and field strain through blood tests and PCR. Control
of the disease The
response to medication programmes is highly variable, and products that work
well on some farms do not appear to work on other.
One of the challenges that face the veterinarian is to predict the
susceptibility of the organism to various antibiotics. This should be done based
on minimum inhibitory tests in the laboratory but it is technically difficult
and not routinely performed in our country.
Treating Mg alone normally does not yield a very good result and treatment
should include a product that controls E coli as well. There
are two live vaccines in the country: TS-11 and 6/85 and there is currently a
significant interest in the F-strain. This
is a vaccine strain that is commonly used in the Conclusion Infection
due to Mg does not make headlines like AI or Newcastle Disease, yet the
cumulative losses due to this organism could easily exceed outbreaks of those
diseases. Although the current focus
is on detecting and controlling the disease through medication and vaccination,
it should shift to eradication. This
can only be done through a concerted effort by the industry as a whole. Dr. Herman Bosman
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|